Can You Disable Horn On 05 Accord

Impression_Soleil Couchant_

Esco to do in the evening.
I leave the little factory, I'm tired, the day was tough, nervous, dusty, bitter and metallic, like the dirty metal, heavy.
But I want air, and the light is beautiful in the late afternoon, clouds are gathering heavy metal, but their is wonderful.
's six middle of the night, I take the camera, I detach myself from the internet, and I leave the house.

Just recently, a half hour before the evening.

Impression: le soleil couchant deliberately recalls, for homology to " Impression: Soleil Levant " by the great impressionist painter Claude Monet, who, in 1872, one hundred years before I was born, (but he did not know, this : D) painted this famous painting by giving her away against her will, to the artistic movement was essential that the 'Impressionism ("c'est un impression" they disparagingly dismissed a critical period in which no one remembers if not for this topic, this Louis Leroy).

One of the things that are more "impressed" in my mind the works of Monet and the Impressionists are their representations "en plein air" sunny fields of ... and .. poppies.
I dreamed, still dream of those bright red spots.
am still amazed at their expanse.

photographed with a long focal lens, in this case a 300 mm zoom without even large apertures results in a scan of plans, in the sense of depth of field (PDC), which allows create before and after the fire zone (PDC of course) in a plot colored spots always more and more confused .. This reminds me a lot do the painting of the Impressionists, and I really like.

Poppies in relaxed,
poppies alone or in small groups.
Here in a wheat field .. the spatial interpretation of this shot is in the sense of perspective depth, clarity and great corner lot.
We used a zoom lens, a Nikkor 12-24 at 12mm and f11 opening.
The ears seem to deliberately surround the big shot, as if to say "who are you what you want" where are you going? ".

here following the philosophy of a totally opposite image.
In this case made with a short canvas, which becomes the medium on a small sensor aps-c, which is a Nikkor 85mm f 1.8, but used here to f4.
The decision not to open more than has been said that the focal length used, the minimum allowed by the optical depth of field even at apertures like f2.8 would have been enough to make clear the entire poppy, which was not in my intentions. A f4 but the subject remains entirely in focus, clarity of optics yield optimum results, however, already getting a considerable detachment of the background.
Here the subject is isolated, decontextualized, although the background you can imagine deliberately. The concept of space here is not in the sense of perspective, but the depth. Here one would bring up Leonardo da Vinci, to continue our parallel to the painting.
Leonardo was in fact the first to give importance to the concept of depth and "density" Understanding how the atmosphere. Note the background in this work, the Madonna of the time .

Here the poppy there ..
but there!
remains behind as a reminiscence of colors.

What you can 'see it as Impressionism was perhaps the most "photographic" between painting movements, so that the theory of those they have developed and applied in practice has much to do with the principles of photography modern, including digital, think of the extreme branch of expressionism, which the "pointillism" , a current that developed the technique to "dots" where the color effect was achieved by combining tiny dots of different colors, making use of key (in practice was a CMYK Profile .. made with oil, tempera and brushes ..) instead of the mix on the palette. This does not address perhaps the modern "pixel"?
not forget how the Impressionist group and the pioneering photographers such as Nadar it frequently, not only in friendship but also of artistic collaboration.
Here I am reminded of the consideration for which, in my opinion, many fotografi moderni mancano spesso di una vera formazione di "visione", vedo molti utilizzatori di macchine fotografiche, ma pochi fotografi e ancor meno artisti. Anche se ho la fortuna di frequentare gente molto brava. Tuttavia non si dovrebbe perdere la dimensione più generale della fotografia come arte visiva, piuttosto che come "tecne", non dimenticando mai che l'aspetto tecnico non è fine a se stesso, ma funzionale al fine artistico, è qui sta la sua importanza.
Avrò modo di tornare sull'argomento in altra occasione.

Sono ormai le sette e mezza..
rientro dai miei campi.. per la cena.

Basta poco, spesso.


Andrea G. 14/05/2010